They are holding a press conference in the Oval Office of The White House after talks lasting about an hour. Image copyright. APImage caption. ![]() ![]() ![]() The two leaders are discussing Anglo- American co- operation across a wide range of issues. Mr Cameron has previously said in relation to cyber attacks that there should be no . No 1. 0 said agents will co- operate in ? That's the focus of today's announcements about war- gaming and threat cells. Or is it about getting hold of data and communications about terrorists? That seemed to be the focus earlier in the week, with briefings that the visit would focus on getting US companies to be more helpful in providing data to British authorities. The two are different in focus and it is not yet clear how much progress on the latter the prime minister will make with a president whose relations with the tech sector are already difficult post- Snowden. There is also some tricky overlap between the two fields, for instance on how far information should be encrypted so it cannot be read or stolen. Encryption may foil foreign cyber spies but also stymie law enforcement. The measures come in the wake of the recent hacking of Sony Pictures' computers and the US military's Central Command's Twitter feed, where comments were posted promoting Islamic State (IS) militants. The cyber attack on Sony Pictures led to data being leaked from its computers exposing emails and personal details about staff and stars. The hackers, who called themselves #GOP or Guardians of Peace, also threatened cinema chains planning to screen Sony's satirical North Korea comedy, The Interview, the plot of which involves a bid to assassinate the country's leader Kim Jong- un. Sony initially cancelled the film's release after leading US cinema groups said they would not screen it, a move which Mr Obama later described as . Image copyright. APImage caption. Cyber security has been the focus so far of the prime minister's visit to Washington. He said not only were civil rights groups worried, but major players in the technology industry said banning encrypted messages could harm British trade if UK companies were seen to be not private. Our correspondent also told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that smaller social networking sites were just as well used by potential hackers as the well- known ones.
He said he had found an example of an exchange on the site Ask. IS fighter asking another user which country he should go to for weapons training. In relation to the site being used for this type of communication Doug Leeds, the chief executive of Ask. Business war games - Wikipedia. Business war gaming or business wargaming is an adaptation of the art of simulating moves and counter- moves in a commercial setting. Unlike military war games, or fantasy war games which can be set hundreds of years in the past, business war games are usually set in the present and are a relatively recent development, but they are growing rapidly. The benefit of teams role playing competitors and developing more robust strategies is especially notable, and can be inferred from a quote such as the one below from Richard Clark, CEO of Merck and Co., who in an interview to USA Today said: . The three types have accordingly, different strengths and weaknesses, and are useful for different applications throughout business. These games are based on mathematical modeling of contestable markets, including chaos theory, random variable generation (Monte Carlo simulations), and econometric modeling of demand and supply conditions. Participants’ generated moves are fed into computer program which generates optimal solutions in the mathematical space. Not surprisingly these games come with a high price tag, and are advocated by large consulting firms which tend to work with the US military establishment. Worldwide digital games market: May 2017. Free-to-play and pay-to-play games grew 17% and 12% respectively. Game of War: Fire Age;. War games combine strategy and action for the most engrossing games you'll. Strategy war games like Takeover, Miragine War. ![]() BIG advocates apply game theory, a branch of mathematics to business situations with the goal of finding an equilibrium, or . The solution can be computed over a large space of all possible (hypothetical) moves of the players. A leading proponent of this type of war games is Niall Fraser, a game theorist and the founder of a consultancy called Open Options. Participants input numerical values for decisions on a wide range of business investments (in production, sales force, advertising, etc.), and receive a computer output of the equilibrium results. Government precludes total victories and cooperation is as prevalent as competition. Similarly, BIB criticizes . Instead, BIB advocates using state- of- the- art competitor analysis techniques and real life competitive intelligence to generate an in- depth profiling of competitors through role playing. The goal of BIB is predicting most likely moves by most significant competitors or other third parties (customers, regulators) so that strategy can be pressure–tested in the most realistic setting. The creator of BIB games is Benjamin Gilad. This approach, used by Mark Chussil, founder of Advanced Competitive Strategies, uses simulations to estimate the likely outcomes from moves made by a business, its competitors, and other relevant actors, across multiple scenarios. Even though the US military have long referred to the practice of ”War Gaming a negotiation”, the term ”Negotiation War Game” was first coined by Soren Malmborg in 2. Negotiation War Games (aka. A structured framework for conducting a preparatory Negotiation Simulation. The act of gathering and including Competitive Intelligence on the forthcoming negotiation and its parties, lets participants in the Negotiation War Game gain an in- depth understanding of the negotiation itself and the negotiation parties. War Games can be used to prepare for virtually all two or three party negotiations. By gathering Competitive Intelligence on the actual negotiation (as well as the individuals involved) an accurate simulation can be created. A client’s employees will then become involved in the actual War Game by acting partly as the company itself, partly as the other negotiating party. Through a series of structured simulations, a tailor- made strategy can then be developed and calibrated. Role- Play Negotiation War Games are especially effective when preparing for Sales- and Procurement negotiations. Corporate games are played over major portfolio decisions such as diversification and/or divestiture moves of the parent company (i. BIW games are less appropriate for business units, or business strategy decisions, as their high price tag and extensive time required from top executives are no match for small scale games with more tailored application and flexible format. On the other hand, BIG games are handicapped in rapidly changing industries, markets where surprise moves by new players is a possibility, situations requiring innovative and creative approaches, and in decisions calling for specific practical ideas rather than more generic moves (such as raise, stay or lower prices by x%). Decision makers looking at war gaming should also be minded of game theory’s own lack of empirical support, as people seem to irrationally follow behaviors that do not result in their best outcome. Business war games employing role- playing and competitor analytical techniques are most beneficial in business strategy at the business unit, market, brands, product and project levels. BIB games have been applied with great success to new product launches, offensive and defensive moves against specific competitors (whose response is analyzed using the advanced competitor analysis techniques), in organizational development’s (training the next generation executive cadre) . According to participants, BIB games provide touch reality- based challenge to strategies and plans that helps companies cope with uncertainty. BIB are also more culture sensitive, and should be applied with caution in cultures where honest discussion of blindspots is less than appreciated. Negotiation War Gaming was used to prepare President Ronald Reagan for his negotiations with Gorbachev in Reykevik and Geneva in 1. Bush in 2. 00. 2. The NTC (National Training Center, Fort Irwin. Ca.) recommend that all U. S. In this case, they are war games for civilians applied with a marketing warfare analogy to a market situation. USA Today, . B1^Fraser, N. M. Hipel (1. 98. 4). Conflict Analysis: Models and Resolutions. New York: North- Holland^Gilad, Ben. Gilad, Ben (2. 00. Business War Games. NJ: Career Press^Chussil, Mark. Richard (2. 00. 6). Penguin Books^Kramer, Henry S. ALM Publishing/ALM Inc.^Diamond, Stuart (2. Crown Business^http: //www. Playing. Pergamon^Diamond, Stuart (2. Crown Business^http: //www. MMJ- Archive/Spring. MMA. pdf^http: //www. Dagbladet B. Wall Street Journal (Eastern edition), Newswire: Dow Jones,5/3/0. Porter, Michael E. Harvard Business Review, May–June, 1. Woodruff (2. 00. 2)^Gilad (2. Kesten C. Green, “Game theory, simulated interaction, and unaided judgment for forecasting decisions in conflicts: Further evidence”, International Journal of Forecasting 2. Green, K. Naval Postgraduate School^Trotman, Ken T. Diamond, Stuart (2. Crown Business^Matlock, J. F. Reagan and Gorbachev: How the cold war ended. New York: Random House^Wilgoren, J. The 2. 00. 4 campaign: Strategy; day after debate, campaigns assess the performances. The New York Times, October 2, Later edition – final, Section A, p. DIME/documents/PUB7. Goria, S. Information display from board wargame for marketing strategy identification, International Competitive Intelligence Conference: Delivering excellence in Competitive Intelligence thinking and practice in a challenging environment, Bad Nauheim, Germany, 2. Fuller, Mark B. Fast Company. Business Insider. Advanced Competitive Strategies. CBS Moneywatch. Fast Company.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2017
Categories |